Nuclear Reaction Networks


Astronomy research
  Software Infrastructure:
     My codes
  White dwarf supernova:
     Remnant metallicities
     Colliding white dwarfs
     Merging white dwarfs
     Ignition conditions
     Metallicity effects
     Central density effects
     Detonation density effects
     Tracer particle burning
     Subsonic burning fronts
     Supersonic burning fronts
     W7 profiles
  Massive star supernova:
     Rotating progenitors
     3D evolution
     26Al & 60Fe
     44Ti, 60Co & 56Ni
     Yields of radionuclides
     Effects of 12C +12C
     SN 1987A light curve
     Constraints on Ni/Fe ratios
     An r-process
     Compact object IMF
     Pulsating white dwarfs
     Pop III with JWST
     Monte Carlo massive stars
     Neutrinos from pre-SN
     Pre-SN variations
     Monte Carlo white dwarfs
     SAGB stars
     Classical novae
     He shell convection
     Presolar grains
     He burn on neutron stars
     BBFH at 40 years
  Chemical Evolution:
     Hypatia catalog
     Zone models H to Zn
     Mixing ejecta
     γ-rays within 100 Mpc
  Thermodynamics & Networks
     Stellar EOS
     12C(α,γ)16O Rate
     Proton-rich NSE
     Reaction networks
     Bayesian reaction rates
  Verification Problems:
     Validating an astro code
Software instruments
Bicycle adventures

AAS Journals
2019 JINA R-process Workshop
2019 MESA Marketplace
2019 MESA Summer School
2019 AST111 Earned Admission
Teaching materials
Education and Public Outreach

Contact: F.X.Timmes
my one page vitae,
full vitae,
research statement, and
teaching statement.
Integration of Nuclear Reaction Networks for Stellar Hydrodynamics
In this paper, methods for solving the stiff system of ordinary differential equations that constitute nuclear reaction networks are surveyed. Three semi-implicit time integration algorithms are examined; a traditional first-order-accurate Euler method, a fourth-order-accurate Kaps-Rentrop method, and a variable-order Bader-Deuflhard method. These three integration methods are coupled to eight different linear algebra packages. Four of the linear algebra packages operate on dense matrices (LAPACK, LUDCMP, LEQS, GIFT), three of them are designed for the direct solution of sparse matrices (MA28, UMFPACK, Y12M), and one uses an iterative method for sparse matrices (BiCG). The scaling properties and behavior of the 24 combinations (3 time integration methods times 8 linear algebra packages) are analyzed by running each combination on seven different nuclear reaction networks.

13 isotope jacobian
Kaps-Rentrop CPU time
Bader-Deuflard CPU time

An Inexpensive Nuclear Energy Generation Network for Stellar Hydrodynamics
In this paper, we compare the nuclear energy generation rate and abundance levels given by an α-chain nuclear reaction network that contains only7 isotopes with a standard 13 isotope α-chain reaction network. The energy generation rate of these two small networks are also compared to the energy generation rate given by a 489 isotope reaction network with weak reactions turned on and off. The comparison between the seven isotope and α-chain reaction networks indicate the extent to which one can be replaced by the other, and the comparison with the 489 isotope reaction network roughly indicates under what physical conditions it is safe to use the seven isotope and α-chain reaction networks.

Energy generation rate comparision
Ratio of energy generation rates
Isotope evolution

Nuclear Reaction Network Codes

Open source codes are avaliable from this link.